“The intent is to convince people that he’s someone he’s not. “The types of things he lies about seem very selective and intentional,” Hart speculated. “I’ve been a terrible liar,” he said, while defending parts of his record in an interview with CNN ’s Piers Morgan. Is there remorse present?” Hart asked, noting that he could not provide a clinical opinion on the matter.įor the record, the congressman has admitted that he has a propensity to massage the truth. “That’s one of the difficult things about Santos. “Our research shows that there’s remorse in pathological liars,” said Curtis. However, there was one tendency that the scientists identified among these serial liars. In their 2020 study on lying, Hart and Curtis found that 83 (or 13 percent) of 623 participants indicated that they or others considered themselves to be pathological liars, which was defined as telling “numerous” lies every day for at least six months. “What people generally mean when they say that is that the person is lying a lot.” “That term ‘pathological liar’ is used very broadly in our culture,” said Hart. But that might be a problematic term when it’s used for someone like Santos, Hart said. “Pathological liar” is the label that seems to stick. “They’re mostly interested in slapping a label on George Santos,” Hart said. He’s been interviewed by the Washington Post and Politico. Recently he has appeared, often with Curtis, on CNN, Fox News, and CBS. Over the past two months, I’ve done thirty,” Hart told. It’s suddenly a hot topic thanks, in part, to the confirmed revelations that Santos spun substantial swaths of his resume from whole cloth, and told copious untruths about virtually everything in his background during his successful bid to win the congressional seat for Long Island, New York.īefore the Santos story broke, “I’d get about two requests a year for interviews. Hart and his research partner, psychologist Drew Curtis of Angelo State University in San Angelo, Texas, are experts in lying. Untangling the Web of Munchausen by Proxy, Malingering, and Factitious Disorder Hypertensive Crisis Secondary to Factitious Disorder Psychological Aspects of Factitious Disorder And he’s been asked a lot of questions about the politician, even though he’s never met the man and per the Goldwater Rule, would never presume to diagnose him from afar. He said he has heard a few good George Santos jokes in the past few months. Hart of Texas Woman’s University in Denton, Texas chuckled at this. The headline of the cheeky, comic book-style ad (drawn by Barry Blitt), purports to be hawking Santos’ online “Fibinars,” in which liars can learn how to free themselves “from the tyranny of the truth.” Recently, The New Yorker published a cartoon depicting George Santos in a mock advertisement for a service aimed at an audience that, most Americans would agree, the first-term Congressman from New York has admitted he is well-qualified to address.ĭo you feel like the gatekeeping elites are preventing you from lying? Although society accepts a certain amount of fibbing, experts are divided on whether or not it is ever OK.When a chronic liar tells an untruth, the amygdala of the brain does not react as strongly compared to someone who does not spin tall tales on a regular basis.Some experts suggest that “pathological lying” should be considered a mental disorder though it is not officially considered one.New York Congressman George Santos’ propensity for lying has sparked a debate about what it means to be a pathological liar.Clinical Relevance: The DSM does not list pathological lying as a mental disorder.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |